1. Find Solution using North-West Corner method
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | Supply |
S1 | 19 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 7 |
S2 | 70 | 30 | 40 | 60 | 9 |
S3 | 40 | 8 | 70 | 20 | 18 |
Demand | 5 | 8 | 7 | 14 | |
Solution:TOTAL number of supply constraints : 3
TOTAL number of demand constraints : 4
Problem Table is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19 | 30 | 50 | 10 | | 7 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30 | 40 | 60 | | 9 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70 | 20 | | 18 |
|
Demand | 5 | 8 | 7 | 14 | | |
The rim values for `S_1`=7 and `D_1`=5 are compared.
The smaller of the two i.e. min(7,5) =
5 is assigned to `S_1` `D_1`
This meets the complete demand of `D_1` and leaves 7 - 5=2 units with `S_1`
Table-1
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19(5) | 30 | 50 | 10 | | 2 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30 | 40 | 60 | | 9 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70 | 20 | | 18 |
|
Demand | 0 | 8 | 7 | 14 | | |
Move horizontally,
The rim values for `S_1`=2 and `D_2`=8 are compared.
The smaller of the two i.e. min(2,8) =
2 is assigned to `S_1` `D_2`
This exhausts the capacity of `S_1` and leaves 8 - 2=6 units with `D_2`
Table-2
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19(5) | 30(2) | 50 | 10 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30 | 40 | 60 | | 9 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70 | 20 | | 18 |
|
Demand | 0 | 6 | 7 | 14 | | |
Move vertically,
The rim values for `S_2`=9 and `D_2`=6 are compared.
The smaller of the two i.e. min(9,6) =
6 is assigned to `S_2` `D_2`
This meets the complete demand of `D_2` and leaves 9 - 6=3 units with `S_2`
Table-3
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19(5) | 30(2) | 50 | 10 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30(6) | 40 | 60 | | 3 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70 | 20 | | 18 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | | |
Move horizontally,
The rim values for `S_2`=3 and `D_3`=7 are compared.
The smaller of the two i.e. min(3,7) =
3 is assigned to `S_2` `D_3`
This exhausts the capacity of `S_2` and leaves 7 - 3=4 units with `D_3`
Table-4
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19(5) | 30(2) | 50 | 10 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30(6) | 40(3) | 60 | | 0 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70 | 20 | | 18 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | | |
Move vertically,
The rim values for `S_3`=18 and `D_3`=4 are compared.
The smaller of the two i.e. min(18,4) =
4 is assigned to `S_3` `D_3`
This meets the complete demand of `D_3` and leaves 18 - 4=14 units with `S_3`
Table-5
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19(5) | 30(2) | 50 | 10 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30(6) | 40(3) | 60 | | 0 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70(4) | 20 | | 14 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | | |
Move horizontally,
The rim values for `S_3`=14 and `D_4`=14 are compared.
The smaller of the two i.e. min(14,14) =
14 is assigned to `S_3` `D_4`
Table-6
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19(5) | 30(2) | 50 | 10 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30(6) | 40(3) | 60 | | 0 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70(4) | 20(14) | | 0 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
Initial feasible solution is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_4` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 19 (5) | 30 (2) | 50 | 10 | | 7 |
`S_2` | 70 | 30 (6) | 40 (3) | 60 | | 9 |
`S_3` | 40 | 8 | 70 (4) | 20 (14) | | 18 |
|
Demand | 5 | 8 | 7 | 14 | | |
The minimum total transportation cost `=19 xx 5+30 xx 2+30 xx 6+40 xx 3+70 xx 4+20 xx 14=1015`
Here, the number of allocated cells = 6 is equal to m + n - 1 = 3 + 4 - 1 = 6
`:.` This solution is non-degenerate