Unbalanced supply and demand
If the total supply is not equal to the total demand then the problem is called unbalanced transportation problem.
It's solution :
1. If the total supply is more than the total demand, then we add a new column, with transportation cost 0
2. If the total demand is more than the total supply, then we add a new row, with transportation cost 0
Example
Find Solution using Column minima method
| D1 | D2 | D3 | Supply |
S1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 76 |
S2 | 16 | 24 | 16 | 82 |
S3 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 77 |
Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | |
Solution:TOTAL number of supply constraints : 3
TOTAL number of demand constraints : 3
Problem Table is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4 | 8 | 8 | | 76 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | | 82 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | | 77 |
|
Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | | |
Here Total Demand = 215 is less than Total Supply = 235. So We add a dummy demand constraint with 0 unit cost and with allocation 20.
Now, The modified table is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | | 76 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 77 |
|
Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | 20 | | |
In `1^(st)` column, The smallest transportation cost is 4 in cell `S_1 D_1`
The allocation to this cell is min(76,72) =
72.
This satisfies the entire demand of `D_1` and leaves 76 - 72 = 4 units with `S_1`
Table-1
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4(72) | 8 | 8 | 0 | | 4 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 77 |
|
Demand | 0 | 102 | 41 | 20 | | |
In `2^(nd)` column, The smallest transportation cost is 8 in cell `S_1 D_2`
The allocation to this cell is min(4,102) =
4.
This exhausts the capacity of `S_1` and leaves 102 - 4 = 98 units with `D_2`
Table-2
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4(72) | 8(4) | 8 | 0 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 77 |
|
Demand | 0 | 98 | 41 | 20 | | |
In `2^(nd)` column, The smallest transportation cost is 16 in cell `S_3 D_2`
The allocation to this cell is min(77,98) =
77.
This exhausts the capacity of `S_3` and leaves 98 - 77 = 21 units with `D_2`
Table-3
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4(72) | 8(4) | 8 | 0 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16(77) | 24 | 0 | | 0 |
|
Demand | 0 | 21 | 41 | 20 | | |
In `2^(nd)` column, The smallest transportation cost is 24 in cell `S_2 D_2`
The allocation to this cell is min(82,21) =
21.
This satisfies the entire demand of `D_2` and leaves 82 - 21 = 61 units with `S_2`
Table-4
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4(72) | 8(4) | 8 | 0 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24(21) | 16 | 0 | | 61 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16(77) | 24 | 0 | | 0 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 41 | 20 | | |
In `3^(rd)` column, The smallest transportation cost is 16 in cell `S_2 D_3`
The allocation to this cell is min(61,41) =
41.
This satisfies the entire demand of `D_3` and leaves 61 - 41 = 20 units with `S_2`
Table-5
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4(72) | 8(4) | 8 | 0 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24(21) | 16(41) | 0 | | 20 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16(77) | 24 | 0 | | 0 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | | |
In `4^(th)` column, The smallest transportation cost is 0 in cell `S_2 D_(dummy)`
The allocation to this cell is min(20,20) =
20.
Table-6
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4(72) | 8(4) | 8 | 0 | | 0 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24(21) | 16(41) | 0(20) | | 0 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16(77) | 24 | 0 | | 0 |
|
Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
Initial feasible solution is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply |
`S_1` | 4 (72) | 8 (4) | 8 | 0 | | 76 |
`S_2` | 16 | 24 (21) | 16 (41) | 0 (20) | | 82 |
`S_3` | 8 | 16 (77) | 24 | 0 | | 77 |
|
Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | 20 | | |
The minimum total transportation cost `= 4 xx 72 + 8 xx 4 + 24 xx 21 + 16 xx 41 + 0 xx 20 + 16 xx 77 = 2712`
Here, the number of allocated cells = 6 is equal to m + n - 1 = 3 + 4 - 1 = 6
`:.` This solution is non-degenerate
This material is intended as a summary. Use your textbook for detail explanation.
Any bug, improvement, feedback then