3. Unbalanced supply and demand example
Unbalanced supply and demand
If the total supply is not equal to the total demand then the problem is called unbalanced transportation problem.
It's solution :
1. If the total supply is more than the total demand, then we add a new column, with transportation cost 0
2. If the total demand is more than the total supply, then we add a new row, with transportation cost 0
Example
Find Solution using Least Cost method
| D1 | D2 | D3 | Supply | S1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 76 | S2 | 16 | 24 | 16 | 82 | S3 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 77 | Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | |
Solution: TOTAL number of supply constraints : 3 TOTAL number of demand constraints : 3 Problem Table is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4 | 8 | 8 | | 76 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | | 77 | | Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | | |
Here Total Demand = 215 is less than Total Supply = 235. So We add a dummy demand constraint with 0 unit cost and with allocation 20. Now, The modified table is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | | 76 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 77 | | Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | 20 | | |
The smallest transportation cost is 0 in cell `S_1 D_(dummy)`
The allocation to this cell is min(76,20) = 20. This satisfies the entire demand of `D_(dummy)` and leaves 76 - 20 = 56 units with `S_1`
Table-1
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0(20) | | 56 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 77 | | Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | 0 | | |
The smallest transportation cost is 4 in cell `S_1 D_1`
The allocation to this cell is min(56,72) = 56. This exhausts the capacity of `S_1` and leaves 72 - 56 = 16 units with `D_1`
Table-2
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4(56) | 8 | 8 | 0(20) | | 0 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 77 | | Demand | 16 | 102 | 41 | 0 | | |
The smallest transportation cost is 8 in cell `S_3 D_1`
The allocation to this cell is min(77,16) = 16. This satisfies the entire demand of `D_1` and leaves 77 - 16 = 61 units with `S_3`
Table-3
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4(56) | 8 | 8 | 0(20) | | 0 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8(16) | 16 | 24 | 0 | | 61 | | Demand | 0 | 102 | 41 | 0 | | |
The smallest transportation cost is 16 in cell `S_3 D_2`
The allocation to this cell is min(61,102) = 61. This exhausts the capacity of `S_3` and leaves 102 - 61 = 41 units with `D_2`
Table-4
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4(56) | 8 | 8 | 0(20) | | 0 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16 | 0 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8(16) | 16(61) | 24 | 0 | | 0 | | Demand | 0 | 41 | 41 | 0 | | |
The smallest transportation cost is 16 in cell `S_2 D_3`
The allocation to this cell is min(82,41) = 41. This satisfies the entire demand of `D_3` and leaves 82 - 41 = 41 units with `S_2`
Table-5
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4(56) | 8 | 8 | 0(20) | | 0 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 | 16(41) | 0 | | 41 | `S_3` | 8(16) | 16(61) | 24 | 0 | | 0 | | Demand | 0 | 41 | 0 | 0 | | |
The smallest transportation cost is 24 in cell `S_2 D_2`
The allocation to this cell is min(41,41) = 41. Table-6
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4(56) | 8 | 8 | 0(20) | | 0 | `S_2` | 16 | 24(41) | 16(41) | 0 | | 0 | `S_3` | 8(16) | 16(61) | 24 | 0 | | 0 | | Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
Initial feasible solution is
| `D_1` | `D_2` | `D_3` | `D_(dummy)` | | Supply | `S_1` | 4 (56) | 8 | 8 | 0 (20) | | 76 | `S_2` | 16 | 24 (41) | 16 (41) | 0 | | 82 | `S_3` | 8 (16) | 16 (61) | 24 | 0 | | 77 | | Demand | 72 | 102 | 41 | 20 | | |
The minimum total transportation cost `= 4 xx 56 + 0 xx 20 + 24 xx 41 + 16 xx 41 + 8 xx 16 + 16 xx 61 = 2968`
Here, the number of allocated cells = 6 is equal to m + n - 1 = 3 + 4 - 1 = 6 `:.` This solution is non-degenerate
This material is intended as a summary. Use your textbook for detail explanation. Any bug, improvement, feedback then
|